10 Reasons Why ‘Venom’ is a Total Mess: An In-Depth Look

10 Reasons Why ‘Venom’ is a Total Mess: An In-Depth Look

Picture yourself eagerly settling down to watch a highly anticipated movie, only to find it to be a mishmash of conflicting elements leaving you bewildered. Welcome to the chaotic ride that is ‘Venom.’ Despite the promise of another engaging superhero saga on the big screen, this film spins off into a whirlwind of confusion and missed opportunities. Let’s unravel why ‘Venom’ didn’t quite hit the mark, leaving both fans and casual viewers scratching their heads.

Inconsistent Tone and Genre Confusion

‘Venom’ aims ambitiously, attempting to straddle multiple genres—thriller, horror, comedy, and drama—but doesn’t blend these elements effectively. This ambitious mix ends up creating a confused narrative that struggles to find its footing. The tonal shifts are jarring and leave scenes feeling disjointed, oscillating between attempting to appease long-time fans seeking the dark and gritty and casual viewers who might prefer a more family-friendly vibe. Instead of a seamless blend, it becomes an erratic patchwork that ultimately descends into absurdity.

  • Action vs. Comedy: Ineffective balance leads to tonal dissonance.
  • Horror Elements: Watered down to accommodate a wider audience.
  • Family-Friendly: Conflicted with the inherently dark nature of Venom’s character.

Forcing the Narrative

The movie often feels like a contrived race to push the plot forward rather than allowing the story to organically evolve from character motivations. Surreal and often illogical decisions are made to maintain momentum, distracting from the film’s potential to explore deeper themes. This narrative rush sacrifices potential character development and leaves audiences questioning the rationality behind key character actions, including the protagonist’s decisions that make little sense even in a fictional universe.

  • Character Choices: Seem designed to defy logic purely to serve plot advancement.
  • Key Examples: A lack of surveillance in high-security areas, irrational alliances.

Tom Hardy’s Lackluster Performance

Tom Hardy, known for bringing charisma and intensity to his roles, appears misused in this movie. While his casting initially generated excitement, Hardy’s portrayal seems subdued, as if uncertain of the tone to adopt. His usually commanding screen presence is replaced by a peculiar mix of disengagement and erratic theatrics when possessed by the symbiote. The result is a performance where Hardy seems either over-the-top or oddly subdued, contributing to the film’s lack of a consistent emotional center.

Misaligned Humor

The humor in ‘Venom’ often comes across as awkward and not well-aligned with the supposed dark undertones of the narrative. Unlike the comics, where Venom’s humor stems from a place of dark irony and complex morality, the film’s attempts often fall flat. This mismatch leads to comedic timing that feels out of place and fails to resonate with audiences expecting the character’s traditionally malevolent edge.

  • Failed Attempts: Humorous scenes result in awkwardness rather than amusement.
  • Character Comedy: Venom’s wit sidesteps the dark irony present in the comics.

The Problem with PG-13 Violence

By adhering to a PG-13 rating, ‘Venom’ misses an opportunity to fully explore the violent and intense nature that defines the character. This decision waters down scenes that might have otherwise showcased Venom’s true ferocity, leaving sequences feeling incomplete. The result is a film that lacks the punch it could have delivered, directly impacting its ability to convincingly portray Venom as a real threat.

Aspect Expectation Reality
Violence Level Intense and visceral Restrained for rating
Impact on Character Fearsome and true to source Softened to inoffensive

Weak Villainy

The villain, Carlton Drake, embodies the issues that plague many films with his forgettable presence and lack of defining characteristics. Drake’s motivations are generic and do not provide the compelling adversarial dynamic that Venom could have thrived against. Riz Ahmed takes on this role but is left with little to work with, resulting in a characterization that fails to provide substantial tension or engagement for the audience.

Subpar Special Effects

In a film where visuals are central, ‘Venom’ disappoints with its execution of special effects. While Venom himself is animated with a degree of care, many other effects, particularly during action sequences and the final showdown, fall flat. The effects, constrained by uninspired camera angles and poor integration, lack the necessary detail and dynamism to create thrilling and memorable action moments.

  • CGI Quality: Inconsistent, compromising the film’s visual impact.
  • Action Sequences: Fail to leverage immersive CGI for engaging battles.

Eddie Brock: World’s Worst Journalist

Eddie Brock’s portrayal as a journalist is riddled with issues. His investigative methods are questionable at best, characterized by rash decisions and a lack of journalistic integrity that any seasoned journalist would avoid. The result is a protagonist who lacks professionalism and realism, undermining the plausibility of his role as a credible investigator in the plot.

  • Professional Competency: Lacks critical skills expected of a journalist.
  • Decision-Making: Often counterproductive and driven by plot needs.

Venom’s Wobbly Motivation

The motivations of Venom as a symbiotic character undergo puzzling and abrupt changes throughout the film. Initially presented with intentions of invasion and dominance, these abruptly shift into a narrative of reluctant heroism, lacking development and a clear rationale. This inconsistency dilutes the symbiote’s complexity and cheapens the character’s potential journey.

The Anti-Hero That Wasn’t

Despite promises of an edgy anti-hero narrative, ‘Venom’ falls back into familiar superhero territory, resulting in a tamed version of the source material. Venom’s transition from anti-hero to hero-in training disappoints, as it forsakes the rich potential for exploring the character’s darker themes and moral ambiguity.

  • Character Evolution: Traditional hero arc instead of complex anti-hero path.
  • Source Material Fidelity: Deviates significantly from anti-hero origins.

À propos de l'auteur :

arnaud

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments